Animal ethics and the argument from absurdity

Abstract

Arguments for the inherent value, equality of interests, or rights of non-human animals havepresented a strong challenge for the anthropocentric worldvie w. However, they have been met with criticism. One form of criticism maintains that, regardless of their theoretical consistency, these 'pro-animal arguments ' cannot be accepted due to their absurdity. Often, particularly inter-species interest conflicts are brought to the fore: if pro-animal arguments were folio wed, we could not solve interest conflicts between species, which is absurd. Because of this absurdity, the arguments need to be abandoned. The paper analyses the strength, background and relevance of this 'argument from absurdity'. It is claimed that in all of the three areas mentioned above, the argument faces severe difficulties. © 2010 The White Horse Press.