"Apples and oranges are both round": Furthering the discussion on the Flynn effect

16Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

While the magnitude of the Flynn effect is well established (approximately 3 points a decade on the Wechsler scales), the causes behind it are still unknown and hotly debated. Kaufman argues that, because of the administrative and scoring changes that occurred with the introduction of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised, Flynn's interpretation of the effect is not appropriate. Although agreeing that these changes account for some aspects of rising IQ, this study questions the impact of these administrative/scoring changes to account for most of the impact, given the heavy documentation of the Flynn effect on multiple IQ tests and norms over time and around the world. The authors also add to the discussion led by Zhou, Zhu, and Weiss by stressing the importance of examining the role of individual differences within the Flynn effect to understand fully the exact nuances and cause(s) of it. © 2010 SAGE Publications.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ceci, S. J., & Kanaya, T. (2010). “Apples and oranges are both round”: Furthering the discussion on the Flynn effect. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 28(5), 441–447. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282910373339

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free