Sign up & Download
Sign in

Attributional complexity: An individual differences measure.

by Garth J. O. Fletcher, Paula Danilovics, Guadalupe Fernandez, Dena Peterson, Glenn D. Reeder
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology ()

Abstract

Describes the development of a scale that measures the complexity of attributional schemata for human behavior—the Attributional Complexity Scale (ACS). In Study 1, the ACS was administered to 289 undergraduates. The results show that the ACS had adequate internal reliability and test–retest reliability, and a factor analysis yielded 1 major factor. Study 2 tested the discriminant and convergent validity of the ACS by administering it to 81 undergraduates. As predicted, attributional complexity was not related to social desirability, academic ability, or internal–external locus of control, but it was positively related to the need for cognition. Study 3 confirmed the prediction that psychology majors (n=59) would have more complex attributional schemata than natural science majors (n=35). Studies 4 and 5, with 174 Ss, provided evidence for the external validity of the scale: Attributionally complex Ss compared with attributionally simple Ss spontaneously produced more causes for personality dispositions and selected more complex causal attributions for simple behavioral events. Implications for various issues in social cognition are discussed. (48 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)

Cite this document (BETA)

Readership Statistics

50 Readers on Mendeley
by Discipline
 
 
 
by Academic Status
 
42% Ph.D. Student
 
12% Doctoral Student
 
10% Student (Master)
by Country
 
8% United States
 
4% Australia
 
2% Sweden

Sign up today - FREE

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research. Learn more

  • All your research in one place
  • Add and import papers easily
  • Access it anywhere, anytime

Start using Mendeley in seconds!

Already have an account? Sign in