Sign up & Download
Sign in

Automatic imitation of intransitive actions

by Clare Press, Geoffrey Bird, Eamonn Walsh, Cecilia Heyes
Brain and Cognition ()

Abstract

Previous research has indicated a potential discontinuity between monkey and human ventral premotor-parietal mirror systems, namely that monkey mirror systems process only transitive (object-directed) actions, whereas human mirror systems may also process intransitive (non-object-directed) actions. The present study investigated this discontinuity by seeking evidence of automatic imitation of intransitive actions-hand opening and closing-in humans using a simple reaction time (RT), stimulus-response compatibility paradigm. Left-right and up-down spatial compatibility were controlled by ensuring that stimuli were presented and responses executed in orthogonal planes, and automatic imitation was isolated from simple and complex orthogonal spatial compatibility by varying the anatomical identity of the stimulus hand and response hemispace, respectively. In all conditions, action compatible responding was faster than action incompatible responding, and no effects of spatial compatibility were observed. This experiment therefore provides evidence of automatic imitation of intransitive actions, and support for the hypothesis that human and monkey mirror systems differ with respect to the processing of intransitive actions. ?? 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Cite this document (BETA)

Readership Statistics

71 Readers on Mendeley
by Discipline
 
 
 
by Academic Status
 
31% Ph.D. Student
 
14% Post Doc
 
10% Assistant Professor
by Country
 
6% United Kingdom
 
6% United States
 
1% Switzerland

Sign up today - FREE

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research. Learn more

  • All your research in one place
  • Add and import papers easily
  • Access it anywhere, anytime

Start using Mendeley in seconds!

Already have an account? Sign in