A bioassay for mosquito repellency against Aedes aegypti : method validation and bioactivities of DEET analogues

  • Jahn A
  • Kim S
  • Choi J
  • et al.
8Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES Vector-borne diseases are still a major mortality factor in Africa and South-east Asia and effective mosquito repellents are therefore needed. An efficient and safe in-vitro assay system using artificial blood and skin substitute could facilitate the development of novel repellents, as most assays currently rely on human subjects or vertebrate whole blood. Moreover, examining the skin permeation profiles could provide safer mosquito repellents. The new assay system could serve as an initial system for testing new repellent candidates upon validation with DEET and its analogues. METHODS N,N-Diethyl-meta-toluamide (DEET) and five analogues were synthesised and used to validate a novel in-vitro bioassay using artificial blood and collagen membrane. Repellency against Aedes aegypti was correlated with lipophilicity and skin permeation. KEY FINDINGS The new in-vitro assay showed good reproducibility (interday relative standard deviation <10% at high concentrations). Four of the five DEET analogues showed repellency similar or superior to that of DEET. Repellency correlated linearly with lipophilicity but stronger repellents tended to permeate skin better. CONCLUSIONS The new in-vitro assay using blood substitute and collagen membrane significantly simplifies screening of possible mosquito repellents. Lipophilicity as well as skin permeation profiles should be considered before testing of compounds that are candidates for mosquito repellents.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jahn, A., Kim, S. Y., Choi, J.-H., Kim, D.-D., Ahn, Y.-J., Yong, C. S., & Kim, J. S. (2010). A bioassay for mosquito repellency against Aedes aegypti : method validation and bioactivities of DEET analogues. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 62(1), 91–97. https://doi.org/10.1211/jpp.62.01.0010

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free