The changing roles of civil society in democratization: Evidence from South Africa (1990-2009) and south korea (1987-2009)

3Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

According to most theorists of democratization, civil society is an important force in bringing about political change. But does the advent of a democratic regime also affect the role of civil society during the consolidation of democracy? If so, what are the most relevant transformations? In order to address such research questions, this article analyses the case of South Africa and South Korea with a specific focus on how civil society has reshaped itself during the phase of democratic consolidation. A particular emphasis is put on the changing relationship with the new democratic governments since the early 1990s until now. The comparative analysis reveals common trends (e.g. risks of cooptation, changing forms of mobilization and new socio-political strategies), while it also singles out the most significant differences (e.g. the constitution of a strong middle-class civil society in South Korea vis-à-vis the crisis and resurgence of civic activism across local communities in South Africa) against the backdrop of two rather different socioeconomic contexts. © 2010 Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fioramonti, L., & Fiori, A. (2010). The changing roles of civil society in democratization: Evidence from South Africa (1990-2009) and south korea (1987-2009). African and Asian Studies, 9(1–2), 83–104. https://doi.org/10.1163/156921010X491272

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free