A closer look at oil, diamonds, and civil war

394Citations
Citations of this article
472Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Studies of natural resource wealth and civil war have been hampered by measurement error, endogeneity, lack of robustness, and uncertainty about causal mechanisms. This paper develops new measures and new tests to address these problems. It has four main findings. First, the likelihood of civil war in countries that produce oil, gas, and diamonds rose sharply from the early 1970s to the late 1990s; so did the number of rebel groups that sold contraband to raise money. Second, exogenous measures of oil, gas, and diamond wealth are robustly correlated with the onset of civil war. Still, these correlations are based on a small number of cases, and the substantive effects of resource wealth are sensitive to certain assumptions. Third, petroleum and diamond production lead to civil wars through at least three different mechanisms. Finally, the only resource variable robustly linked to conflict duration is a measure of "contraband," which includes gemstones, timber, and narcotics.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ross, M. (2006). A closer look at oil, diamonds, and civil war. Annual Review of Political Science, 9, 265–300. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.9.081304.161338

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free