Objective: To determine the comparative effectiveness of various approaches to diaphragmatic hernia (DH) repair, including open abdominal, laparoscopic abdominal, and thoracotomy. Design, Setting, and Patients: Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 1999 to 2008, a comprehensive cohort of 38 764 patients (mean [SD] age, 60.8 [19.5] years) hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of DH who underwent repair was identified. Main Outcomes Measures: Morbidity and mortality of patients who underwent DH repair. Results: Open approaches were the most common, performed in 91% of patients (open abdominal, n=28 824 [74.4%]; thoracotomy, n=6573 [17.0%]). Hospital mortality was 1.1% or less for each of the approaches. However, patients who underwent a laparoscopic DH repair had a shorter length of stay (mean [SD], 4.5 [0.10] days) and fewer discharges to skilled nursing facilities than those who underwent open abdominal or thoracotomy repair approaches. Patients who underwent a DH repair through a thoracotomy approach had the longest length of stay (mean [SD], 7.8 [0.11] days) and a higher need for postoperative mechanical ventilation than those undergoing open or laparoscopic abdominal approaches (5.6% vs 3.2% vs 2.3%, respectively; P
CITATION STYLE
Paul, S., Nasar, A., Port, J. L., Lee, P. C., Stiles, B. C., Nguyen, A. B., … Sedrakyan, A. (2012). Comparative analysis of diaphragmatic hernia repair outcomes using the nationwide inpatient sample database. Archives of Surgery, 147(7), 607–612. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2012.127
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.