Comparison of engineering costs of raw freshwater, reclaimed water and seawater for toilet flushing in Hong Kong

21Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Hong Kong is one of the very few coastal cities in the world that use 'dual water supply systems'. Dual water supply involves two distribution systems: a freshwater system for potable use and a seawater system for toilet flushing. This study looks into the feasibility, from an engineering cost point of view, of extending seawater supply into districts where potable water is still being used for toilet flushing, including South District of Hong Kong Island, Sai Kung, Northern New Territories and Northwest New Territories. Besides seawater, raw (untreated) freshwater and reclaimed water (treated effluent from local sewage treatment works) are also considered to be used for toilet flushing for these districts. Six cases are developed for comparison by using the lowest net present value of cost criterion. The result shows that using seawater for toilet flushing in these districts has the best engineering economy. © 2006 CIWEM.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tang, S. L., Yue, D. P. T., & Li, X. Z. (2006). Comparison of engineering costs of raw freshwater, reclaimed water and seawater for toilet flushing in Hong Kong. Water and Environment Journal, 20(4), 240–247. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-6593.2006.00036.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free