Controversial issues in restrictive cardiomyopathy

ISSN: 00325473
8Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The topic of restrictive cardiomyopathy remains controversial for many reasons. The term cardiomyopathy is unfortunately sometimes used interchangeably with diastolic heart failure. Furthermore, diastolic heart failure is sometimes linked with other causes of diastolic dysfunction such as hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and mitral valve disease. Restrictive cardiomyopathy is a clinical entity of primary or secondary myocardial disease presenting a picture that closely simulates that of constrictive pericarditis. In the majority of cases the correct diagnosis can be arrived at following a careful paradigm that begins with history and may end with endomyocardial biopsy. Many of the old teachings about how to distinguish restrictive cardiomyopathy from constrictive pericarditis have not held up with time and clinical experience: in particular equal diastolic pressures on both sides of the heart are compatible with either restrictive cardiomyopathy or constrictive pericarditis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shabetai, R. (1992). Controversial issues in restrictive cardiomyopathy. In Postgraduate Medical Journal (Vol. 68).

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free