Critical policy evaluation and the question of values: A psychosocial approach

16Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper proposes a tentative approach to critical policy evaluation. It does so through a central focus on values. It suggests that emerging psychosocial approaches to welfare provide a useful way of considering values associated with the subjective dimension of welfare. Evaluation is presented as discursively constructed within political, scientific and popular discourses. It is a socially situated practice, whose meaning and methodology are contested by politicians, policy-makers, evaluation commissioners, welfare practitioners, professional evaluators and users of services. Contestation is approached as a methodological issue and a question of power. In this respect, evaluation is seen as part of a governance strategy but the argument seeks to avoid the tendency towards functionalism of some recent accounts of evaluation as governance. Instead, the question is approached by considering the role of values in evaluation. The article seeks to relate what are referred to as the internal values that guide evaluation practice with the external values of political critique. Copyright © 2006 Critical Social Policy Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Taylor, D. (2006). Critical policy evaluation and the question of values: A psychosocial approach. Critical Social Policy, 26(1), 243–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018306059774

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free