Dabigatran compared with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and previous transient ischaemic attack or stroke: a subgroup analysis of the RE-LY trial.

  • Diener HC Ezekowitz MD Reilly PA, Yang S, Xavier D, Di Pasquale G, Yusuf S, RE-LY study group, Connolly S J W
  • H.-C. D
  • S.J. C
  • et al.
ISSN: 1474-4422
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the Randomised Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy (RE-LY) trial, dabigatran reduced occurrence of both stroke and haemorrhage compared with warfarin in patients who had atrial fibrillation and were at increased risk of stroke. We aimed to assess the effects of dabigatran compared with warfarin in the subgroup of patients with previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack., METHODS: In the RE-LY trial, 18,113 patients from 967 centres in 44 countries were randomly assigned to 110 mg or 150 mg dabigatran twice daily or to warfarin dose adjusted to international normalised ratio 2[middle dot]0 to 3[middle dot]0. Median follow-up was 2[middle dot]0 years (IQR 1[middle dot]14-2[middle dot]86), and the primary outcome was stroke or systemic embolism. The primary safety outcome was major haemorrhage. Patients and investigators were aware of whether patients received warfarin or dabigatran, but not of dabigatran dose, and event adjudicators were masked to treatment. In a predefined analysis, we investigated the outcomes of the RE-LY trial in subgroups of patients with or without previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack. RE-LY is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00262600., FINDINGS: Within the subgroup of patients with previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack, 1195 patients were from the 110 mg dabigatran group, 1233 from the 150 mg dabigatran group, and 1195 from the warfarin group. Stroke or systemic embolism occurred in 65 patients (2[middle dot]78% per year) on warfarin compared with 55 (2[middle dot]32% per year) on 110 mg dabigatran (relative risk 0[middle dot]84, 95% CI 0[middle dot]58-1[middle dot]20) and 51 (2[middle dot]07% per year) on 150 mg dabigatran (0[middle dot]75, 0[middle dot]52-1[middle dot]08). The rate of major bleeding was significantly lower in patients on 110 mg dabigatran (RR 0[middle dot]66, 95% CI 0[middle dot]48-0[middle dot]90) and similar in those on 150 mg dabigatran (RR 1[middle dot]01; 95% CI 0[middle dot]77-1[middle dot]34) compared with those on warfarin. The effects of both doses of dabigatran compared with warfarin were not significantly different between patients with previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack and those without for any of the outcomes from RE-LY apart from vascular death (110 mg group compared with warfarin group, interaction p=0[middle dot]038)., INTERPRETATION: The effects of 110 mg dabigatran and 150 mg dabigatran twice daily in patients with previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack are consistent with those of other patients in RE-LY, for whom, compared with warfarin, 150 mg dabigatran reduced stroke or systemic embolism and 110 mg dabligatran was non-inferior. [corrected] Most effects of both dabigatran doses were consistent in patients with versus those without previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack., FUNDING: Boehringer Ingelheim.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Diener HC  Ezekowitz MD  Reilly PA, Yang S, Xavier D, Di Pasquale G, Yusuf S, RE-LY study group, Connolly S J, W. L., H.-C., D., S.J., C., M.D., E., L., W., P.A., R., … Diener HC  Ezekowitz MD  Reilly PA  Xavier D, Di Pasquale G, Yusuf S, RE-LY study group, Connolly S J, Wallentin L, Y. S. (2010). Dabigatran compared with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and previous transient ischaemic attack or stroke: a subgroup analysis of the RE-LY trial. The Lancet. Neurology, 9(12), 1157. Retrieved from http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&PAGE=reference&D=cctr&NEWS=N&AN=CN-00770651

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free