Effects of attention and time-pressure on P300 subcomponents and implications for mental workload research

32Citations
Citations of this article
67Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Our approach to objective measures of mental workload is establishing relationships between components of the event-related brain potential (ERP) and information processing stages. These relationships can be used to infer the influence of specific workload conditions on specific processing stages. We recently showed that the ERP component P300 in choice tasks is composed of two subcomponents, P-SR and P-CR, which are time-related to stimulus-evaluation and response-selection. With these relations we could specify which processing stages were affected when certain workload conditions are varied. When attention was divided between the visual and auditory modalities compared to (unimodal) focused attention, the choice reaction time (RT) was prolonged, primarily in the auditory modality. This delay was mainly reflected in the P-CR latency, which shows that the division of attention mainly impairs the response-selection process in the auditory modality due to a bias of attention towards the visual modality. When the time-pressure was increased, the latency of the P-CR (and not of the P-SR) was shortened, but less than the choice RT. This suggests a (limited) acceleration of response-selection but not of stimulus evaluation. Since the response-selection process was accelerated less than the overt choice RT, an increase of the error rate was consequently observed. In summary we showed that increases of mental workload can induce accelerations or decelerations of specific processing stages which can be monitored by observing latency changes of the affiliated ERP components. © 1995.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hohnsbein, J., Falkenstein, M., & Hoormann, J. (1995). Effects of attention and time-pressure on P300 subcomponents and implications for mental workload research. Biological Psychology, 40(1–2), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-0511(95)05109-0

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free