Environmental crisis or 'lie of the land'? The debate on soil degradation in Africa

73Citations
Citations of this article
208Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Agronomic analyses of soil dynamics in Africa have been found to be too simplifying and lacking any perspective on the critical role of farmers. Yet soil degradation is widespread and serious, and in many cases cannot be remedied by low levels of external inputs. To explain the fate of African soils, we use the co-evolutionary approach that critics of simple agronomic analyses propose, focusing especially on the interaction between short-term local and long-term global processes. From the late 19th century, industrialisation has broken the endogenous relation between population and prices that until then had facilitated gradual agricultural intensification. At the same time, Africa's evolution in the world system reproduced social structures that hindered more rapid transformations because they precluded a mass eviction of farm workers. The same structures fostered politics that encouraged taxing farmers rather than supporting farmers to allow gradual intensification in spite of low international prices. In this situation, population growth caused vicious spirals of poverty and soil degradation rather than sustainable intensification. This dynamic cannot be changed by participatory approaches alone: public investment in infrastructure and a reversal in price policies are also needed. © 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Koning, N., & Smaling, E. (2005). Environmental crisis or “lie of the land”? The debate on soil degradation in Africa. Land Use Policy, 22(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2003.08.003

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free