Ethical issues in journal peer-review

Abstract

In some recent articles, Dr. Leigh Turner [Doffing the Mask: Why Manuscript Reviewers Ought to Be Identifiable," Journal of Academic Ethics, 1 (2003), pp. 41-48; "Promoting F.A.I.T.H. in Peer Review: Five Core Attributes in Effective Peer Review," Journal of Academic Ethics, 1 (2003), pp. 181-188.] makes some rather critical observations regarding the processes of peer-review in academic journals. I shall note them in turn, note wherein I concur and wherein I disagree, and discuss some of Turner's suggestions to resolve such difficulties. It is hoped that my comments on Turner's much-appreciated points will engage readers of this august and well-edited journal to take more seriously Turner's arguments for the sake of the betterment of academic research. © Springer 2005.