Sign up & Download
Sign in

Evaluating research: From informed peer review to bibliometrics

by Giovanni Abramo, Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo
Scientometrics ()

Abstract

National research assessment exercises are becoming regular events in ever more countries. The present work contrasts the peer-review and bibliometrics approaches in the conduct of these exercises. The comparison is conducted in terms of the essential parameters of any measurement system: accuracy, robustness, validity, functionality, time and costs. Empirical evidence shows that for the natural and formal sciences, the bibliometric methodology is by far preferable to peer-review. Setting up national databases of publications by individual authors, derived from Web of Science or Scopus databases, would allow much better, cheaper and more frequent national research assessments.

Cite this document (BETA)

Readership Statistics

56 Readers on Mendeley
by Discipline
 
 
 
by Academic Status
 
20% Ph.D. Student
 
16% Librarian
 
13% Other Professional
by Country
 
11% Netherlands
 
5% United Kingdom
 
5% Spain

Sign up today - FREE

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research. Learn more

  • All your research in one place
  • Add and import papers easily
  • Access it anywhere, anytime

Start using Mendeley in seconds!

Already have an account? Sign in