Evaluation of collaborative filtering algorithms for recommending articles on citeulike

ISSN: 16130073
1Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Motivated by the potential use of collaborative tagging systems to develop new recommender systems, we have implemented and compared three variants of user-based collaborative filtering algorithms to provide recommendations of articles on CiteULike. On our first approach, Classic Collaborative filtering (CCF), we use Pearson correlation to calculate similarity between users and a classic adjusted ratings formula to rank the recommendations. Our second approach, Neighbor-weighted Collaborative Filtering (NwCF), incorporates the amount of raters in the ranking formula of the recommendations. A modified version of the Okapi BM25 IR model over users' tags is implemented on our third approach to form the user neighborhood. Our results suggest that incorporating the number of raters into the algorithms leads to an improvement of precision, and they also support that tags can be considered as an alternative to Pearson correlation to calculate the similarity between users and their neighbors in a collaborative tagging system.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Parra, D., & Brusilovsky, P. (2009). Evaluation of collaborative filtering algorithms for recommending articles on citeulike. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings (Vol. 467).

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free