The False Promise of International Institutions

1Citations
Citations of this article
1.1kReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Since the Cold War ended, Western policymakers have sought to create security arrangements in Europe, as well as in other regions of the globe, that are based on international institutions. In doing so, they explicitly reject balance-of-power politics as an organizing concept for the post-Cold War world. During the 1992 presidential campaign, for example, President Clinton declared that, “in a world where freedom, not tyranny, is on the march, the cynical calculus of pure power politics simply does not compute. It is ill-suited to a new era.” Before taking office, Anthony Lake, the president’s national security adviser, criticized the Bush administration for viewing the world through a “classic balance of power prism, " whereas he and Mr. Clinton took a “more ʼneo-Wilsonian’ view.”.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mearsheimer, J. J. (2017). The False Promise of International Institutions. In International Organization (pp. 237–281). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315251981-9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free