Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology in the American Anthropologist Rare but Exquisite Gems

  • Buikstra J
  • King J
  • Nystrom K
18Citations
Citations of this article
63Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article explores forensic anthropological and bioarchaeological publishing patterns in the American Anthropologist (n.s.). Early contributions by Harris Hawthorne Wilder on both subjects are considered in detail, including previously unrecognized discussions of taphonomic variables. Articles on forensic anthropology in the American Anthropologist appear only during the first four decades of publication. While relatively well represented in early issues, bioarchaeological articles decrease in number over time. Comparative data from six other journals suggest that their presence has had a profound effect on the American Anthropologist . The impact of the "new" physical anthropology on publishing patterns in bioarchaeology is also assessed. [Keywords: forensic anthropology, funerary archaeology, paleodemography, paleopathology, taphonomy]

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Buikstra, J. E., King, J. L., & Nystrom, K. C. (2003). Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology in the American Anthropologist Rare but Exquisite Gems. American Anthropologist, 105(1), 38–52. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2003.105.1.38

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free