Global integration ≠ global concentration

24Citations
Citations of this article
64Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

There is a widespread belief that increases in the cross-border integration of markets are associated with increases in global concentration along various dimensions. This article reviews the available evidence and presents new data, indicating that increasing global integration has not been accompanied by general increases in four types of global concentration measures: industry seller concentration, cross-industry superconcentration, national/regional hegemony, and geographic concentration. The article also uses the automobile industry to illustrate a bias toward believing concentration is increasing even when it is not and to discuss possible reasons. © 2006 Oxford University Press.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ghemawat, P., & Ghadar, F. (2006). Global integration ≠ global concentration. Industrial and Corporate Change. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtl013

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free