Half standard deviation estimate of the minimally important difference in HRQOL scores?

132Citations
Citations of this article
85Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In addition to statistical significance, it is important to evaluate the magnitude of differences in health-related quality of life over time. Interest in establishing the minimal difference that is clinically important or the minimally important difference has burgeoned over the last few years. This review summarizes some of the leading approaches to estimating the minimally important difference, offers caveats on the minimally important difference estimation based on existing literature and provides recommendations for future work. The authors recommend using multiple anchors to estimate the minimally important difference, using only anchors that correspond to minimal change in health-related quality of life, reporting information about the variation around the estimates, and providing bounded estimates to reflect the uncertainty. © Future Drugs Ltd. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Farivar, S. S., Liu, H., & Hays, R. D. (2004, October). Half standard deviation estimate of the minimally important difference in HRQOL scores? Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research. https://doi.org/10.1586/14737167.4.5.515

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free