Improvisation as a Curricular Metaphor: Imagining Education for a Rural Creative Class

  • Corbett M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Rural communities contain a largely unacknowledged innovative capacity founded on improvisational traditions. These traditions may be rooted in work practices in agriculture and other rurally-based productive activities but today they have expanded into other lifeworld locations, particularly virtual spaces that accelerate time-space compression. I make the case here that in the networked world of high modernity or postmodernity, both the nature of rurality and the potential of rural education need to be theorized differently. I begin with a critique of Richard Florida’s metrocentric idea of the creative class, then move to reconceptualizing rurality as a real and imagined space, and conclude by analyzing a fi lm and video project in an Atlantic Canadian school that used improvisation in literacy curriculum work. I argue that improvisation is a potentially productive metaphor for curriculum, one which draws on rural traditions and local funds of knowledge while at the same time incorporating a productive, forward-looking engagement with new technologies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Corbett, M. (2013). Improvisation as a Curricular Metaphor: Imagining Education for a Rural Creative Class. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 28(10), 1–11.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free