While his own preference may have been for an engaging book over an exciting ballgame, John Stuart Mill’s distinction in Utilitarianism between higher and lower pleasures offers a useful framework for thinking about contemporary sport. This first became apparent while teaching Utilitarianism to undergraduates, whose interest is often piqued by using Mill’s distinction to rank popular sports such as baseball, football and basketball. This paper explores more seriously the relevance of Mill’s distinction for thinking about sport, focusing specifically on his claims about intellectual complexity and aesthetic value. It finds that while the distinction of higher and lower pleasures does support a hierarchy among sports, it remains problematic to assert that any sport could in fact constitute a genuine higher pleasure.
CITATION STYLE
Schwartz, D. T. (1998). John Stuart Mill and the Ends of Sport. In The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy (pp. 32–37). Philosophy Documentation Center. https://doi.org/10.5840/wcp20-paideia199838698
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.