Legal measures to combat piracy and armed robbery in the Horn of Africa and in Southeast Asia: A comparison

5Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Somalia and Southeast Asia have, at different times, been considered "hotspots" for piracy and armed robbery against ships. Some scholars have argued that comparisons between the two regions are pointless due to the different geopolitical factors that affect the respective regions and vastly different tactics used by Somali pirates and Southeast Asian pirates. Further, the differences in geopolitical considerations and tactics have meant that the legal measures used to respond to attacks in these regions have also greatly differed. The purpose of this article is to critically examine and evaluate the legal measures taken to facilitate the arrest, prosecution and punishment of pirates in Somalia and Southeast Asia. It concludes that while the legal measures employed by the relevant stakeholders differ in each region, valuable lessons can be learned on how States, regional organizations and international organizations can strengthen legal frameworks for the effective arrest and prosecution of perpetrators of piracy and armed robbery. © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Davenport, T. (2012). Legal measures to combat piracy and armed robbery in the Horn of Africa and in Southeast Asia: A comparison. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 35(7–8), 570–587. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2012.684656

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free