The patent is supposed to be a means to an end, that end being innovation. Whether the innovation comes from the protection the patent affords the inventor, or from the dissemination of the information of invention the patent allows, the patent is not meant to be an end in itself. This seems to be changing, the patent acquiring a strategic value increasingly independent of innovation. If this development has gone largely unnoticed, it may be because the patent system tends to be viewed from the entrenched perspectives of lawyers and economists, and of a number of interest groups that justify their reliance on the system in terms of the innovation it is supposed to encourage. These groups have never included small firms and developing countries in whose name they frequently defend the patent system. They may have some difficulty justifying a system whose strategic value is so divorced from its value for innovation. © 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
CITATION STYLE
Macdonald, S. (2004). When means become ends: Considering the impact of patent strategy on innovation. Information Economics and Policy, 16(1), 135–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2003.09.008
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.