Methane observations from the Greenhouse Gases Observing SATellite: Comparison to ground-based TCCON data and model calculations

187Citations
Citations of this article
133Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We report new short-wave infrared (SWIR) column retrievals of atmospheric methane (X CH4) from the Japanese Greenhouse Gases Observing SATellite (GOSAT) and compare observed spatial and temporal variations with correlative ground-based measurements from the Total Carbon Column Observing Network (TCCON) and with the global 3-D GEOS-Chem chemistry transport model. GOSAT X CH4 retrievals are compared with daily TCCON observations at six sites between April 2009 and July 2010 (Bialystok, Park Falls, Lamont, Orleans, Darwin and Wollongong). GOSAT reproduces the site-dependent seasonal cycles as observed by TCCON with correlations typically between 0.5 and 0.7 with an estimated single-sounding precision between 0.4-0.8%. We find a latitudinal-dependent difference between the X CH4 retrievals from GOSAT and TCCON which ranges from 17.9 ppb at the most northerly site (Bialystok) to-14.6 ppb at the site with the lowest latitude (Darwin). We estimate that the mean smoothing error difference included in the GOSAT to TCCON comparisons can account for 15.7 to 17.4 ppb for the northerly sites and for 1.1 ppb at the lowest latitude site. The GOSAT X CH4 retrievals agree well with the GEOS-Chem model on annual (August 2009-July 2010) and monthly timescales, capturing over 80% of the zonal variability. Differences between model and observed X CH4 are found over key source regions such as Southeast Asia and central Africa which will be further investigated using a formal inverse model analysis. Copyright 2011 by the American Geophysical Union.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Parker, R., Boesch, H., Cogan, A., Fraser, A., Feng, L., Palmer, P. I., … Wunch, D. (2011). Methane observations from the Greenhouse Gases Observing SATellite: Comparison to ground-based TCCON data and model calculations. Geophysical Research Letters, 38(15). https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047871

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free