A metric for odorant comparison

159Citations
Citations of this article
314Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In studies of vision and audition, stimuli can be systematically varied by wavelength and frequency, respectively, but there is no equivalent metric for olfaction. Restricted odorant-feature metrics such as number of carbons and functional group do not account for response patterns to odorants varying along other structural dimensions. We generated a multidimensional odor metric, in which each odorant molecule was represented as a vector of 1,664 molecular descriptor values. Revisiting many studies, we found that this metric and a second optimized metric were always better at accounting for neural responses than the specific metric used in each study. These metrics were applicable across studies that differed in the animals studied, the type of olfactory neurons tested, the odorants applied and the recording methods used. We use this new metric to recommend sets of odorants that span the physicochemical space for use in olfaction experiments.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Haddad, R., Khan, R., Takahashi, Y. K., Mori, K., Harel, D., & Sobel, N. (2008). A metric for odorant comparison. Nature Methods, 5(5), 425–429. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1197

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free