Mirizzi syndrome: History, present and future development

88Citations
Citations of this article
50Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Mirizzi syndrome was reported in 0.3-3% of patients undergoing cholecystectomy. The distortion of anatomy and the presence of cholecystocholedochal fistula increase the risk of bile duct injury during cholecystectomy. Methods: A Medline search was undertaken to identify articles that were published from 1974 to 2004. Additional papers were identified by a manual search of the references from the key articles. Results: A preoperative diagnosis was made in 8-62.5% of cases. Open surgical treatment gave good short-term and long-term results. There was a lack of good data in laparoscopic treatment. Conversion to open surgery rates was high, and bile duct injury rate varied from 0 to 22.2%. Conclusion: A high index of clinical suspicion is required to make a preoperative or intraoperative diagnosis, which leads to good surgical planning to treat the condition. Open surgery is the gold standard. Mirizzi syndrome should still be considered as a contraindication for laparoscopic surgery. © 2006 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lai, E. C. H., & Lau, W. Y. (2006, April). Mirizzi syndrome: History, present and future development. ANZ Journal of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.2006.03690.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free