The Moral Significance of the Material Culture

8Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Ethics as a philosophical discipline has always been preoccupied with theory to the detriment of practice and the exclusion of material culture. Lately, practice has been rehabilitated, but material culture continues to be ignored. Cultural critics and sociologists have attended to it but have also refrained from a moral assessment of it. The findings of Csikszentmihalyi and Rochberg-Halton, however, reflect two kinds of cultural realities that sponsor two kinds of conduct. The first kind, represented by musical instruments, I call commanding reality. It invites social and physical engagement and provides orientation within the world. The second kind, exemplified by stereos, consists of consumable commodities and conduces to a life of distraction and disorientation. I conclude that ethics is not just a matter of conduct within whatever reality but of deciding which kind of reality we favor over the other. My plea is on behalf of commanding reality. © 1992 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Borgmann, A. (1992). The Moral Significance of the Material Culture. Inquiry (United Kingdom), 35(3–4), 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/00201749208602295

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free