Skip to main content
Journal Article

Why Most Published Research Findings Are False: Author’s Reply to Goodman and Greenland

  • John P. A. Ioannidis
PLoS Medicine (2007) 4(3) 399-400
ISSN: 15491277
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The implications for PLoS Medicine and other journals of new research, published in this issue, showing that there are major variations in the reporting quality of systematic reviews.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

John P. A. Ioannidis. (2007). Why Most Published Research Findings Are False: Author’s Reply to Goodman and Greenland. PLoS Medicine, 4(3), 399–400.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free