Sign up & Download
Sign in

National research assessment exercises: A comparison of peer review and bibliometrics rankings

by Giovanni Abramo, Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo, Flavia Di Costa
Scientometrics ()

Abstract

Development of bibliometric techniques has reached such a level as to suggest their integration or total substitution for classic peer review in the national research assessment exercises, as far as the hard sciences are concerned. In this work we compare rankings lists of universities captured by the first Italian evaluation exercise, through peer review, with the results of bibliometric simulations. The comparison shows the great differences between peer review and bibliometric rankings for excellence and productivity. TS - CrossRef

Cite this document (BETA)

Readership Statistics

27 Readers on Mendeley
by Discipline
 
 
 
by Academic Status
 
26% Ph.D. Student
 
15% Other Professional
 
15% Student (Master)
by Country
 
7% Netherlands
 
7% Spain
 
7% United States

Sign up today - FREE

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research. Learn more

  • All your research in one place
  • Add and import papers easily
  • Access it anywhere, anytime

Start using Mendeley in seconds!

Already have an account? Sign in