"Positive", "descriptive" and "empirical" theories are frequently promoted as being more realistic, factual and relevant than normative approaches. This paper argues that "positive" or "empirical" theories are also normative and value-laden in that they usually mask a conservative ideological bias in their accounting policy implications. We argue that labels such as "positive" and "empirical" emanate from a Realist theory of knowledge; a wholly inadequate epistemological basis for a social science. We use an alternative philosophical position (of Historical Materialism) together with a historical review of the concept of value to illustrate first, the partisan role played by theories and theoreticians in questions concerning social control, social conflict and social order; second, the ideologically conservative underpinnings of positive accounting theories; and last, some indications of alternative (radical) approaches to accounting policy. © 1982.
CITATION STYLE
Tinker, A. M., Merino, B. D., & Neimark, M. D. (1982). The normative origins of positive theories: Ideology and accounting thought. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 7(2), 167–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(82)90019-8
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.