Open access publishing models: opportunity or threat to scholarly and academic publishers?
Learned Publishing (2004)
- ISSN: 09531513
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-7133.2011.00224.x
- PubMed: 22103923
Available from www.ingentaconnect.com
or
Abstract
Various models of open access publishing and new initiatives are reviewed through the published literature with recommended strategies for traditional journal publishers.
Available from www.ingentaconnect.com
Page 1
Open access publishing models: op...
Introduction ��� Openaccess��� isanewmovementin scholarlypublishing.Openaccessjour- nalsprovidefreeaccesstosomeorall oftheirresearcharticles.Inadditiontoopen accessjournals,thereareopenaccess archivesandrepositories.Althoughopen accesspublishingmodelsappeartohave emergedovernight,momentumhasbeen buildingforthelasttenyears,sincetheearly 1990swhenthefirstarticlepreprintservers cameintoexistenceandacademicauthors beganamovetoretaincopyright.Because advocatesofopenaccesspublishingcome fromboththeconsumingandthesupply sideofscholarlypublishing��� authors, readers,scholarsandlibrarians��� whowant tochangethestatusquo,itisvitalfor traditionalpublisherstopayattentiontothe messagestheirmarketsaresending.This articleexaminesthenascenceoftheopen accessmovement,thekeydriverspushing foropenaccess,andnewstrategiesfor scholarlypublisherstoconsiderinsatisfying theirreaders��� andbuyers���demands. Background Before1945,nearlyalljournalsinthe UnitedStateswerepublishedbyprofessional societies.ThisdiffersfromEuropewhere earlyonjournalswerepublishedbycom- mercialpublishers.SinceWorldWarII, scholarlyjournalspublishingandelectronic publishinghavebeenevolvingintandem. Themodernscholarlyjournalemergedas fundingincreasedforscientificresearchin supportoftheUS��� spacerace��� andthe ColdWar(TenopirandKing,2000).Jour- nalsproliferatedandbecameincreasingly specialized.Manynewjournalswerestarted bycommercialpublishers.In1995there wereanestimated6,771scientificjournals intheUnitedStates,includingpsychology andsocialsciencepublications(Tenopir andKing,2000).Onerecentestimateof Open access publishing models: opportunityor threattoscholarly andacademic publishers? ChristineLamb Consultant,PublishingandMarketStrategies �� ChristineLamb2004 ABSTRACT:Variousmodelsofopenaccess publishingandnewinitiativesarereviewedthrough thepublishedliteraturewithrecommended strategiesfortraditionaljournalpublishers. LearnedPublishing (2004)17, 143���150 ChristineLamb Openaccesspublishingmodels:opportunityorthreattoscholarlyandacademicpublishers? 143 LEARNEDPUBLISHINGVOL.17NO.2APRIL2004
Page 2
scholarlyjournalsworldwideis70,000��� 80,000(MeadowsandSingletoncitedin TenopirandKing,2000).Otherestimates are23,500journals(Harnad,2003)and 15,000peer-reviewedjournals(Jongejan, 2003).Commercialpublisherspublish40% ofalljournalsintheUStoday(Tenopirand King,1997).Incontrast,theDirectoryof OpenAccessJournals(http://www.doaj.org) lists697titles. Theincreaseinthenumberofscientists workinginthelasthalfofthetwentieth century,andtheparallelincreaseinspecial- izedoutputfromthesescientistshave contributedtotheproliferationofjournals andtheneedforfindingandfilteringindexes. Twosecondarypublishersinparticular,have beenselectiveinthejournalstheyaccepted forindexing:IndexMedicusorMedline covers4,600titlesandtheScienceCitation IndexandCurrentContentspublishedby theInstituteofScientificInformation indexes5,900titles.Thejournalsinthese indexeshavebecomea��� core��� ofthemost highlyrankedandcitedpublicationsintheir fields.Somescholars,whocompeteto publishtheirarticlesinthemostvisible journals,perceivethatpublishershave capitalizedontheserankingsandtaken profitsattheexpenseofpubliclyfunded researchbychargingoverlyhighpricesfor journalssubscriptions,which,inturn, restrictsaccesstoonlythoseuniversities thatcanaffordtopay.Universitiesoften requirepublicationincorejournalsfor promotionandtenure,insomeinstances withlessregardforthecontentormeritof thescienceinthearticle(Guedon,2003). Supportforopenaccesspublishingmodels thatallowfreeaccesstoresearchistiedto creatingafairerpeer-reviewprocessthat valuestheresearchinitselfinsteadofwhere itispublished. Electronicjournalspublishing Beforethe1990smostelectronicscholarly publishingwasintheformofbibliographic databasesorfindingdevicesthatpointedto printissuesoffull-textarticlesonlibrary shelves.Intheearly1990sdocument deliveryservicesweredevelopedusingfree, searchablecitationandtablesofcontents databasesontheInternettolocatefull-text printarticlesthatwerecopiedandfaxedto therecipientforafee.Inthemid-1990s,the standardsfortheWorldWideWebwere releasedandelectronicfull-textjournals becamepossible.Itisinthecontextofthe fullpromiseofelectronicjournalsthatopen accesshasemergedasanewpublishing model. Theimpetusforopenaccessvariesby disciplinebutarosefirstinthesciences.It beganinphysics,mathsandcomputer sciencewiththecreationofanopenarchive ofprepublicationpapers(preprints)in1991 byPaulGinspargatLosAlamos,andinlife scienceswithitsurgentmissioninthe1980s toidentifytheoriginsandcurefortheAIDS virusandlaterinthe1990swiththehuman genomeproject.In1997,Medlinebecame freeontheInternet,andin1999,therepos- itoryPubMedCentralwaslaunched.The openaccessmovementisstilllimitedto smallgroupsofproselytizershelpedrecently bythehugeworldwidepublicrelationscam- paignaroundthelaunchofPloS.Themost vocaladvocatesofopenaccessareactivist academicswithtenureinscience,some leadersintheresearchlibrarycommunity, scientificcommunitiesoutsidetheUnited Statesandinthedevelopingworldcountries suchasBrazilandIndia(bothcountries havegoodInternetinfrastructureandlarge populationsofscientists).Byandlarge, though,theaverageacademicfacultymember isunfamiliarwithopenaccessconcepts (Suber,privatecommunication,2003).For openaccesstoreallytakeoffitneedsto catchfirewithyoung,Internet-savvyschol- arswhodonotyethavetenure,forwhom electronicpublishingandinformationare secondnature.Openaccess��� sfuturelieswith thenextgeneration. Asoftoday,thereareonlyahandful oftrulyopenaccesspublishers,BioMed Central(http://www.biomedcentral.com),a commercialenterprisebasedintheUKand PublicLibraryofScience(www.plos.org), foundedbyNobel-laureateHaroldVarmus inSanFrancisco,Californiabeingthemost ambitious. Definitionsofopenaccess Definingopenaccessisaworkinprogress withdifferentinterpretationsdependenton universities oftenrequire publicationin corejournals forpromotion and tenure 144 C. Lamb LEARNEDPUBLISHINGVOL.17NO.2APRIL2004
Readership Statistics
6 Readers on Mendeley
by Discipline
17% Humanities
17% Social Sciences
by Academic Status
17% Senior Lecturer
17% Student (Master)
17% Librarian
by Country
33% United Kingdom
17% India
17% Croatia
Sign up today - FREE
Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research. Learn more
- All your research in one place
- Add and import papers easily
- Access it anywhere, anytime


