Oral chloral hydrate vs. intranasal midazolam for sedation during computerized tomography

20Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We conducted this single blind randomized clinical trial to compare the efficacy and safety of oral chloral hydrate and intranasal midazolam for induction of sedation for computerized tomography scan of brain in children. Participants aged 1-10 years (n=60) were randomized to receive 100 mg/kg chloral hydrate orally with intra nasal normal saline OR intranasal midazolam 0.2 mg/kg with oral normal saline. Adequate sedation (Ramsay sedation score of four) was obtained and CT scan completed successfully in 76.7% of chloral hydrate group and in 40% of midazolam group (P=0.004). No significant difference was seen for side effects frequency between the two drugs (10% in chloral hydrate, 3.3% in midazolam group; P= 0.34). We conclude that oral chloral hydrate can be considered as a safe and effective drug for sedation in children undergoing CT scan of brain. © 2013 Indian Academy of Pediatrics.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fallah, R., Nakhaei, M. H. A., Behdad, S., Moghaddam, R. N., & Shamszadeh, A. (2013). Oral chloral hydrate vs. intranasal midazolam for sedation during computerized tomography. In Indian Pediatrics (Vol. 50, pp. 233–235). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-013-0065-5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free