Relative efficiency of pitfall trapping and hand-collecting from plots for sampling of millipedes

33Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Millipedes were sampled by hand-collecting from plots and by pitfall trapping at three forest sites in central Tasmania. Seven days of pitfall trapping each month over one year was less efficient than four weeks of hand-collecting in autumn, yielding fewer species and fewer specimens per working day in the field. Hand-collecting is likely to provide more accurate data on species diversity and relative abundance for a range of litter invertebrates. © 1995 Chapman & Hall.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mesibov, R., Taylor, R. J., & Brereton, R. N. (1995). Relative efficiency of pitfall trapping and hand-collecting from plots for sampling of millipedes. Biodiversity and Conservation, 4(4), 429–439. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00058426

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free