Religion, Ethics and the Implications for Moral Education: A critique of Nucci's Morality and Religious Rules

9Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Through a critique of a recent argument by Larry Nucci, this article claims that for many religious believers, religion and morality cannot be wholly separated. Accordingly, efforts at moral education that seek to ignore the role of religion in moral judgement will fail to engage with the realities of many students' moral frameworks. In contrast to Nucci's claim that religion is irrelevant to moral judgement, this essay argues that morality is only weakly independent from religion. Moral knowledge does not derive exclusively from religious sources, but none the less involves relevant (and sometimes critical) religious considerations. Accordingly, moral education in American public schools needs curricula that help students explore and understand various moral rationales and motivations from a variety of cultural sources, religious and otherwise, providing opportunities for students to engage with difference and develop the capacity for mutual respect and (when necessary) reasonable disagreement.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kunzman, R. (2003, September 1). Religion, Ethics and the Implications for Moral Education: A critique of Nucci’s Morality and Religious Rules. Journal of Moral Education. Carfax Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305724032000136671

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free