From Reload to ReCourse: learning from IMS Learning Design implementations

36Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The use of the Web to deliver open, distance, and flexible learning has opened up the potential for social interaction and adaptive learning, but the usability, expressivity, and interoperability of the available tools leave much to be desired. This article explores these issues as they relate to teachers and learning designers through the case of the Reload Learning Design Editor and its successor, ReCourse. The applications are introduced and the results of evaluation are summarized. The principal challenges overcome in the development process are identified. By reflecting on the development process, the applications produced, evaluation, and user feedback, the conclusions regarding IMS Learning Design (IMS LD) and its potential use are identified. The principal areas discussed are programming frameworks, terminology, graphical interfaces, the relative salience of IMS LD elements, integration with authors’ workflow, the authoring of services, and the authoring of IMS LD level B.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Griffiths, D., Beauvoir, P., Liber, O., & Barrett‐Baxendale, M. (2009). From Reload to ReCourse: learning from IMS Learning Design implementations. Distance Education, 30(2), 201–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910903023199

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free