Reply to Hartig et al. [arXiv:1305.3544]: The "true model" myth

  • Perretti C
  • Munch S
  • Sugihara G
ArXiv: 1307.5747
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We have shown that commonly used model-fitting methods fail when the underlying ecological system is chaotic. Importantly, Hartig & Dormann [arXiv:1305.3544] suggest an alternative method that is able to overcome this problem for the logistic model when the "true model" is known. This is encouraging, however the more relevant test is of the method when the "true model" is unknown, as it always is for real ecosystems. By making a small modification to the "true model," we find that the suggested method provides inaccurate forecasts and severely biased estimates of the ecological dynamics. In contrast, a model-free approach is able to provide accurate forecasts and a useful foundation for ecological understanding without the burdensome assumption of a "true model."

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Perretti, C. T., Munch, S. B., & Sugihara, G. (2013). Reply to Hartig et al. [arXiv:1305.3544]: The “true model” myth. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1307.5747

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free