This paper presents a critique of current methods of sampling and analyzing soils for metals in archaeological prospection. Commonly used methodologies in soil science are shown to be suitable for archaeological investigations, with a concomitant improvement in their resolution. Understanding the soil-fraction location, concentration range, and spatial distribution of autochthonous (native) soil metals is shown to be a vital precursor to archaeological-site investigations, as this is the background upon which anthopogenic deposition takes place. Nested sampling is suggested as the most cost-effective method of investigating the spatial variability in the autochthonous metal concentrations. The use of the appropriate soil horizon (or sampling depth) and point sampling are critical in the preparation of a sampling regime. Simultaneous extraction is proposed as the most efficient method of identifying the location and eventual fate of autoehthonous and anthropogenic metals, respectively. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
CITATION STYLE
Haslam, R., & Tibbett, M. (2004). Sampling and analyzing metals in soils for archaeological prospection: A critique. Geoarchaeology. John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/gea.20022
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.