Sampling design and inferential bias in archaeological soil chemistry

49Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The ways and extent to which sampling design influences data collection and archaeological inference is a constant concern for archaeologists. Yet, spatial analyses based on anthrosol chemistry have been less willing to concede this problem and to explore potential solutions. This article reviews the recent literature on soil sampling for spatial studies and then uses an example from prehispanic Honduras to examine how both quantitative and qualitative interpretations of soil chemical patterns can shift when sampling design changes. The results of this study suggest that the principal challenges to selecting an appropriate sampling design are in determining the sample size and density, as well as recognizing and adequately dealing with variation in the soil properties being measured. These findings provide cautionary tales for spatial studies aimed at using soil chemical data to infer activity patterns in the archaeological record. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wells, E. C. (2010). Sampling design and inferential bias in archaeological soil chemistry. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 17(3), 209–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-010-9087-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free