Sequential versus simultaneous schelling models: Experimental evidence

9Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article shows the results of experiments where subjects play the Schelling's spatial proximity model. Two types of experiments are conducted: one in which choices are made sequentially and a variation of the first where the decision making is simultaneous. The results of the sequential experiments are identical to Schelling's prediction: subjects finish in a segregated equilibrium. Likewise, in the variant of the simultaneous decision experiment, the same result is reached: segregation. Subjects' heterogeneity generates a series of focal points in the first round. To locate themselves, subjects use these focal points immediately, and as a result, the segregation takes place again. Furthermore, simultaneous experiments with commuting costs allow us to conclude that introducing positive moving costs does not affect segregation. © The Author(s) 2011.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Benito, J. M., Brañas-Garza, P., Hernández, P., & Sanchis, J. A. (2011). Sequential versus simultaneous schelling models: Experimental evidence. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 55(1), 60–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002710374714

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free