Statistical errors in medical research - A review of common pitfalls

107Citations
Citations of this article
393Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: standards in the use of statistics in medical research are generally low. A growing body of literature points to persistent statistical errors, flaws and deficiencies in most medical journals. Methods: in this paper we present a comprehensive review of common statistical pitfalls which can occur at different stages in the scientific research process, ranging from planning a study, through conducting statistical data analysis and documenting statistical methods applied, to the presentation of study data and interpretation of study results. Results: 47 potential statistical errors and shortcomings, differentiated for the distinct phases of medical research are presented and discussed. Conclusions: statisticians should be involved early in study design, as mistakes at this point can have major repercussions, negatively affecting all subsequent stages of medical research. Consideration of issues discussed in this paper, when planning, conducting and preparing medical research manuscripts, should help further enhance statistical quality in medical journals.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Strasak, A. M., Zaman, Q., Pfeiffer, K. P., Göbel, G., & Ulmer, H. (2007, January 27). Statistical errors in medical research - A review of common pitfalls. Swiss Medical Weekly. SMW supporting association. https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2007.11587

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free