Supervision and scholarly writing: writing to learn—learning to write

  • Diezmann C
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
89Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper describes an action research project on postgraduate students’ scholarly writing in which I employed reflective approaches to examine and enhance my postgraduate supervisory practice. My reflections on three distinct cycles of supervision illustrate a shift in thinking about scholarly writing and an evolving understanding of how to support postgraduate students’ writing. These understandings provide the foundation for a future-oriented fourth cycle of supervisory practice, which is characterised by three principles, namely the empowerment of students as writers, the technological context of contemporary writing, and ethical issues in writing.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Diezmann, C. M. (2005). Supervision and scholarly writing: writing to learn—learning to write. Reflective Practice, 6(4), 443–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623940500300491

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free