To tell the truth: On scientific counterpublics

Abstract

Research in the public understanding of science for and against the public deficit model often is based on assumptions of individualism and lay knowledge.That approach to the public is contrasted with a second and third concept of the public.Subordinate networks in diverse social fields can form counterpublics when they claim to represent the general public benefit better than the official constructions of the public and public interest that are articulated by the spokespersons of the dominant agents of the respective social fields.Among the counterpublics are those formed by subordinate networks in the scientific field.Two cases of scientific counterpublics, their relations with subordinate networks in other social fields, and their alternative concepts of public good, are explored in an effort to develop a broader understanding of the public and publics.Two policy implications, targeted funding pools and the "dissensus conference," are discussed as possible policy innovations that could be developed in addition to deliberative and consultative approaches such as the consensus conference.© The Author(s), 2010.