Tracking citations and altmetrics for research data: Challenges and opportunities

  • Konkiel S
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
160Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Editor's Summary Methods for determining research quality have long been debated but with little lasting agreement on standards, leading to the emergence of alternative metrics. Altmetrics are a useful supplement to traditional citation metrics, reflecting a variety of measurement points that give different perspectives on how a dataset is used and by whom. A positive development is the integration of a number of research datasets into the ISI Data Citation Index, making datasets searchable and linking them to published articles. Yet access to data resources and tracking the resulting altmetrics depend on specific qualities of the datasets and the systems where they are archived. Though research on altmetrics use is growing, the lack of standardization across datasets and system architecture undermines its generalizability. Without some standards, stakeholders' adoption of altmetrics will be limited.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Konkiel, S. (2013). Tracking citations and altmetrics for research data: Challenges and opportunities. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 39(6), 27–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/bult.2013.1720390610

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free