Bayes nets are formal representations of causal systems that many psychologists have claimed as plausible mental representations. One purported advantage of Bayes nets is that they may provide a theory of counterfactual conditionals, such as If Calvin had been at the party, Miriam would have left early. This article compares two proposed Bayes net theories as models of people's understanding of counterfactuals. Experiments 1-3 show that neither theory makes correct predictions about back-tracking counterfactuals (in which the event of the if-clause occurs after the event of the then-clause), and Experiment 4 shows the same is true of forward counterfactuals. An amended version of one of the approaches, however, can provide a more accurate account of these data. Copyright © 2009 Cognitive Science Society, Inc. All rights reserved.
CITATION STYLE
Rips, L. J. (2010). Two causal theories of counterfactual conditionals. Cognitive Science, 34(2), 175–221. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01080.x
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.