Uncertainties and assumptions associated with APT and SANS characterisation of irradiation damage in RPV steels

17Citations
Citations of this article
60Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Atom probe tomography (APT) and small angle neutron scattering (SANS) have been extensively used to characterise irradiation damage in reactor pressure vessel steels. There have been some notable successes, but also some difficulties reconciling the data from these techniques. Indeed, as techniques improve, we learn more about their intrinsic limitations and the inherent assumptions used in the data analyses. In this research, some of the key uncertainties associated with the two techniques are identified and it is shown how apparently reasonable assumptions can lead to radically different conclusions. It is also demonstrated that the use of multiple techniques helps compensate for the shortcomings of individual techniques. However, uncertainties still remain, particularly in our ability to characterise matrix damage. © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hyde, J. M., Burke, M. G., Smith, G. D. W., Styman, P., Swan, H., & Wilford, K. (2014). Uncertainties and assumptions associated with APT and SANS characterisation of irradiation damage in RPV steels. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 449(1–3), 308–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.07.029

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free