The effects of Q-matrix misspecification on parameter estimates and classification accuracy in the DINA model

149Citations
Citations of this article
88Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article reports a study that investigated the effects of Q-matrix misspecifications on parameter estimates and misclassification rates for the deterministic-input, noisy "and" gate (DINA) model, which is a restricted latent class model for multiple classifications of respondents that can be useful for cognitively motivated diagnostic assessment. In this study, a Q-matrix for an assessment mapping all 15 possible attribute patterns based on four independent attributes was misspecified by changing one "0" or "1" for each item. This was done in a way that ensured that certain attribute combinations were completely deleted from the Q-matrix, and certain incorrect dependency relationships between attributes were represented. Results showed clear effects that included an itemspecific overestimation of slipping parameters when attributes were deleted from the Q-matrix, an item-specific overestimation of guessing parameters when attributes were added to the Q-matrix, and high misclassification rates for attribute classes that contained attribute combinations that were deleted from the Q-matrix. © 2008 Sage Publications.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rupp, A. A., & Templin, J. (2008). The effects of Q-matrix misspecification on parameter estimates and classification accuracy in the DINA model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68(1), 78–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164407301545

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free