‘American Exceptionalism’ in Goals for Civil Litigation

2Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

American procedure has long been exceptional, a fact that baffles Americans and non-Americans alike. But focusing on the goals of civil litigation provides an important insight into why U.S. procedure is so different. Everyone around the world wants procedure that suitably balances accuracy with economy. But American procedure seeks to enable litigants in this country to go further, by enforcing public norms through private initiative, a major reason why it puts fewer obstacles in the way of prospective plaintiffs. That seems to be a uniquely American role for civil litigation, and largely explains the relaxed pleading, broad discovery, and jury trial features of American civil litigation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Marcus, R. (2014). ‘American Exceptionalism’ in Goals for Civil Litigation. In Ius Gentium (Vol. 34, pp. 123–141). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03443-0_6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free