Evaluation and comparison of computational tools for RNA-seq isoform quantification

112Citations
Citations of this article
514Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Alternatively spliced transcript isoforms are commonly observed in higher eukaryotes. The expression levels of these isoforms are key for understanding normal functions in healthy tissues and the progression of disease states. However, accurate quantification of expression at the transcript level is limited with current RNA-seq technologies because of, for example, limited read length and the cost of deep sequencing. Results: A large number of tools have been developed to tackle this problem, and we performed a comprehensive evaluation of these tools using both experimental and simulated RNA-seq datasets. We found that recently developed alignment-free tools are both fast and accurate. The accuracy of all methods was mainly influenced by the complexity of gene structures and caution must be taken when interpreting quantification results for short transcripts. Using TP53 gene simulation, we discovered that both sequencing depth and the relative abundance of different isoforms affect quantification accuracy Conclusions: Our comprehensive evaluation helps data analysts to make informed choice when selecting computational tools for isoform quantification.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhang, C., Zhang, B., Lin, L. L., & Zhao, S. (2017). Evaluation and comparison of computational tools for RNA-seq isoform quantification. BMC Genomics, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-4002-1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free